Research Skills
Research skills enable agents to conduct thorough investigations, verify claims, and synthesize information from multiple sources with proper citations.Available Research Skills
Deep Research
Comprehensive research with multi-source synthesis and citations
Fact Checker
Systematic fact verification and misinformation identification
Academic Researcher
Literature review and academic writing expertise
Data Analyst
SQL, pandas, and statistical analysis capabilities
Deep Research
Overview
Triggers: Conducting research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics from multiple perspectives, investigation, synthesized analysis with citationsWhen to Use
- Conducting in-depth research on a topic
- Synthesizing information from multiple sources
- Creating research summaries with proper citations
- Analyzing different viewpoints and perspectives
- Identifying key findings and trends
- Evaluating the quality and credibility of sources
Research Process
Clarify the Research Question
- What exactly needs to be researched?
- What level of detail is required?
- Are there specific angles to prioritize?
- What is the purpose of the research?
Identify Key Aspects
- Break the topic into subtopics or dimensions
- List main questions to answer
- Note important context or background needed
Gather Information
- Consider multiple perspectives
- Look for primary and secondary sources
- Check publication dates and currency
- Evaluate source credibility
Synthesize Findings
- Identify patterns and themes
- Note areas of consensus and disagreement
- Highlight key insights
- Connect related information
Output Format
Source Evaluation Criteria
- Peer-Reviewed Journals
- Official Reports
- Reputable News
- Expert Commentary
- General Websites
Credibility: Highest
- Undergone rigorous peer review
- Published in reputable journals
- Methodology transparent
- Data and analysis verifiable
Example Research Output
Research Question: “What are the benefits and risks of intermittent fasting?” Executive Summary: Intermittent fasting (IF) shows promising benefits for weight loss and metabolic health based on current research, though long-term effects remain under study. Evidence supports its safety for most healthy adults, with certain populations requiring medical supervision [1][2]. Key Findings:- Weight Loss: IF produces similar weight loss to calorie restriction (5-8% body weight over 12 weeks), with potentially better adherence [1]
- Metabolic Health: May improve insulin sensitivity by 20-31% and reduce inflammation markers [2]
- Safety: Not recommended for pregnant women, diabetics without supervision, or those with eating disorder history [4]
Fact Checker
Overview
Triggers: Verifying claims, checking facts, identifying misinformation, “fact check”, “verify”, “is this true”, evaluating source credibilityWhen to Use
- Verifying specific claims or statements
- Identifying potential misinformation or disinformation
- Checking statistics and data accuracy
- Evaluating source credibility
- Separating fact from opinion or interpretation
- Analyzing viral claims or rumors
Verification Process
Identify the Claim
- Extract the specific factual assertion
- Distinguish fact from opinion
- Note any implicit claims
- Identify measurable aspects
Determine Required Evidence
- What would prove this claim?
- What would disprove it?
- What sources would be authoritative?
- Can this be verified or is it opinion?
Evaluate Available Evidence
- Check authoritative sources
- Look for primary data
- Consider source credibility
- Note publication dates
- Check for context
Rate the Claim
- Assess accuracy based on evidence
- Note confidence level
- Explain reasoning clearly
- Highlight missing context if relevant
Rating Scale
✅ TRUE
Claim is accurate and supported by reliable evidence
⚠️ MOSTLY TRUE
Claim is accurate but missing important context or minor details wrong
🔶 MIXED
Claim contains both true and false elements
❌ MOSTLY FALSE
Claim is misleading or largely inaccurate
🚫 FALSE
Claim is demonstrably wrong
❓ UNVERIFIABLE
Cannot be confirmed or denied with available evidence
Common Misinformation Patterns
Statistical Manipulation
Statistical Manipulation
- Cherry-picking data
- Misleading graphs or scales
- Correlation vs causation confusion
- Inappropriate comparisons
- Selective timeframes
Context Removal
Context Removal
- Quote mining (taking statements out of context)
- Omitting important qualifiers
- Ignoring timeframes or conditions
- Removing statistical caveats
- Partial truths presented as whole story
False Equivalences
False Equivalences
- Comparing incomparable things
- Treating all sources as equally valid
- Both-sidesing settled science
- Anecdotes vs statistical evidence
Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies
- Ad hominem attacks
- Appeal to authority (improper)
- False dichotomies
- Slippery slope arguments
- Straw man arguments
Example Fact Check
Claim: “Humans only use 10% of their brain” Verdict: 🚫 FALSE Analysis: This is a persistent myth with no scientific basis. Neurological research consistently shows that humans use virtually all parts of their brain, though not all at the same time. Evidence:- Brain imaging (fMRI, PET scans) shows activity throughout the brain during even simple tasks [1]
- Brain damage to any area causes functional impairment, indicating all regions serve purposes [2]
- Metabolic studies show the brain uses ~20% of body’s energy despite being ~2% of body weight [3]
Academic Researcher
Overview
Triggers: Literature review, academic writing, research papers, scholarly sources, peer review, academic citations, thesis, dissertationWhen to Use
- Conducting literature reviews
- Writing academic papers
- Finding and evaluating scholarly sources
- Synthesizing academic research
- Following academic citation styles (APA, MLA, Chicago)
- Critiquing research methodology
Academic Research Process
- Define Research Question: Clear, focused, answerable
- Literature Search: Use academic databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, JSTOR)
- Source Evaluation: Assess peer-review status, methodology, citations
- Synthesis: Identify themes, gaps, contradictions
- Citation: Proper academic citation format
- Critical Analysis: Evaluate strengths and limitations
Academic Writing Principles
- Objective Tone: Avoid emotional language
- Evidence-Based: Every claim supported by citations
- Clear Structure: Introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion
- Proper Citations: Follow style guide exactly
- Critical Thinking: Analyze, don’t just summarize
- Acknowledge Limitations: Be transparent about constraints
Data Analyst
Overview
Triggers: Data analysis, SQL queries, pandas, statistical analysis, data visualization, analyzing datasets, data insightsWhen to Use
- Analyzing datasets with pandas
- Writing SQL queries
- Performing statistical analysis
- Creating data visualizations
- Finding patterns and insights in data
- Cleaning and preprocessing data
- Generating reports from data
Key Capabilities
SQL:- Complex queries with JOINs
- Aggregations and window functions
- Query optimization
- Database design
- Data cleaning and preprocessing
- Exploratory data analysis
- Statistical calculations
- Data transformation
- Choosing appropriate chart types
- Creating clear, informative plots
- Dashboard design
- Storytelling with data
- Descriptive statistics
- Hypothesis testing
- Correlation and regression
- Probability distributions
Installation
Add all research skills:Next Steps
Coding Skills
Explore software development skills
Writing Skills
Discover writing and documentation skills
Planning Skills
Learn about project and sprint planning
Create Custom Skills
Build your own agent skills
