Overview
Intensity Analysis (IA) is a quantitative method to analyze land use and cover (LUC) maps at several time steps using cross-tabulation matrices. Each matrix summarizes the LUC change at each time interval. The framework evaluates at three levels the deviation between observed change intensity and hypothesized uniform change intensity.Intensity Analysis is based on the methodology described in Aldwaik & Pontius (2012): “Intensity analysis to unify measurements of size and stationarity of land changes by interval, category, and transition.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(1), pp. 103-114.
The Three-Level Framework
Intensity Analysis consists of three hierarchical levels, where each level provides more detailed information than the previous one:- Interval Level - Examines how size and rate of change vary across time intervals
- Category Level - Examines how size and intensity of gross losses and gains vary across categories
- Transition Level - Examines how size and intensity of transitions vary across categories
Interval Level Analysis
The interval level indicates how the size and speed of change vary across time intervals. This is the most general level of analysis.Key Metrics
- St - Annual change intensity for interval t
- U - Uniform change intensity across all intervals
Interpretation
The interval level compares the observed change intensity (St) in each time interval to the uniform intensity (U) across the entire study period:- If St > U: The interval has a fast rate of change (more active than average)
- If St < U: The interval has a slow rate of change (less active than average)
Example Code
The interval level analysis is particularly useful for identifying periods of rapid land use change versus periods of relative stability.
Category Level Analysis
The category level examines for each time interval how the size and intensity of gross losses and gross gains in each category vary across categories.Key Metrics
For Gains
- Gtj - Annual intensity of gain for category j during interval t
- St - Uniform intensity for the interval (from interval level)
For Losses
- Lti - Annual intensity of loss for category i during interval t
- St - Uniform intensity for the interval (from interval level)
Interpretation
Gain Analysis
- If Gtj > St: Category has active gain (gains more intensively than uniform)
- If Gtj < St: Category has dormant gain (gains less intensively than uniform)
Loss Analysis
- If Lti > St: Category has active loss (loses more intensively than uniform)
- If Lti < St: Category has dormant loss (loses less intensively than uniform)
Example Code
Understanding Active vs. Dormant Categories
Understanding Active vs. Dormant Categories
A category is considered active when its gain or loss intensity exceeds the uniform intensity for that interval. This means the category is experiencing change more intensively than would be expected if all categories changed uniformly.Conversely, a dormant category experiences change less intensively than the uniform rate, suggesting it is relatively stable compared to other categories.
Transition Level Analysis
The transition level determines for each category how the size and intensity of a category’s transitions vary across the other categories that are available for that transition.Key Metrics
For Transitions to Category n (Gain)
- Rtin - Annual intensity of transition from category i to target category n
- Wtn - Uniform intensity of transition to category n
For Transitions from Category m (Loss)
- Qtmj - Annual intensity of transition from category m to category j
- Vtm - Uniform intensity of transition from category m
Interpretation
Gain of Category n
- If Rtin > Wtn: Category i is targeted by category n (systematic gain from i)
- If Rtin < Wtn: Category i is avoided by category n (less gain from i than expected)
Loss of Category m
- If Qtmj > Vtm: Category j targets category m (systematic loss to j)
- If Qtmj < Vtm: Category j avoids category m (less loss to j than expected)
Example Code
When performing
intensityAnalysis(), you must specify two categories:category_n: A target category that experienced relevant gainscategory_m: A category that experienced important losses
Stationarity Testing
At each level, Intensity Analysis tests for stationarity of patterns across time intervals. According to Aldwaik & Pontius (2012), a pattern is considered stationary when the intensities for all time intervals reside on one side of the uniform intensity.What is Stationarity?
- Stationary (Y): All time intervals show intensities consistently above OR consistently below the uniform rate
- Non-stationary (N): Intensities fluctuate above and below the uniform rate across different intervals
Accessing Stationarity Results
Complete Analysis Example
Here’s a complete workflow for performing all three levels of intensity analysis:Understanding the Output Objects
Understanding the Output Objects
The
intensityAnalysis() function returns a list with 6 objects:- lulc_table: Contingency table with category names (instead of numeric codes)
- interval_lvl: An
Intervalobject containing St and U values - category_lvlGain: A
Categoryobject with gain metrics (Gtj) - category_lvlLoss: A
Categoryobject with loss metrics (Lti) - transition_lvlGain_n: A
Transitionobject for gains of category n (Rtin and Wtn) - transition_lvlLoss_m: A
Transitionobject for losses of category m (Qtmj and Vtm)
References
- Aldwaik, S. Z. and Pontius, R. G. (2012). Intensity analysis to unify measurements of size and stationarity of land changes by interval, category, and transition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(1), pp. 103-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.02.010
- Aldwaik, S. Z. and Pontius, R. G. (2013). Map errors that could account for deviations from a uniform intensity of land change. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(9), pp. 1717-1739. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2013.787618