Overview
The/arckit.stakeholders command performs comprehensive stakeholder analysis using a Driver → Goal → Outcome framework to understand WHO cares about the project and WHY.
When to Use
- Phase: Phase 2 - Stakeholder Analysis
- Timing: BEFORE business case and requirements
- Purpose: Establish complete traceability from stakeholder drivers through goals to measurable outcomes
Command Usage
Examples
What It Creates
Phase 1: Identify Stakeholders
- Internal Stakeholders: Executives, business units, technical teams, operations, compliance, security, finance
- External Stakeholders: Regulators, customers, vendors, partners
- Power-Interest Grid: ASCII box diagram showing engagement levels
- Stakeholder Details Table: Power, Interest, Quadrant, Engagement Strategy
Phase 2: Understand Drivers
For each key stakeholder, identify underlying motivations:| Driver Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| STRATEGIC | Competitive advantage, market position, innovation | ”Modernize tech stack to attract talent” |
| OPERATIONAL | Efficiency, quality, speed, reliability | ”Reduce invoice processing from 7 days to 2 days” |
| FINANCIAL | Cost reduction, revenue growth, ROI | ”Reduce datacenter costs by £2M annually” |
| COMPLIANCE | Regulatory requirements, audit findings, risk | ”Achieve ISO 27001 certification” |
| RISK | Avoiding penalties, preventing failures | ”Zero unplanned downtime during migration” |
| PERSONAL | Career advancement, workload reduction | ”Deliver manifesto commitment for promotion” |
| CUSTOMER | Satisfaction, retention, acquisition | ”Improve Net Promoter Score from 45 to 70” |
- Clear driver statement (what motivates them)
- Context & background (why this exists)
- Intensity: CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
- Enablers (what would help)
- Blockers (what would hinder)
Phase 3: Map Drivers to Goals
Convert drivers into SMART goals: Example:- Driver: CFO - Reduce operational costs (FINANCIAL, HIGH)
- Goal: G-1: Reduce invoice processing time from 7 days to 2 days by Q2 2026
- Success Metric: Processing time (days)
- Baseline: 7 days
- Target: 2 days
- Measurement Method: Daily automated reporting from finance system
- Dependencies: Finance system API access
- Risks: Data quality issues in legacy system
Phase 4: Map Goals to Outcomes
Define measurable business outcomes: Example:- Goal: G-1: Reduce processing time from 7 days to 2 days
- Outcome: O-1: 30% operational efficiency increase measured by transactions per FTE
- KPI: Transactions processed per FTE per month
- Current Value: 500 transactions/FTE/month
- Target Value: 650 transactions/FTE/month (+30%)
- Measurement Frequency: Monthly
- Business Value: £2M annual cost savings (CFO satisfied)
- Timeline: Q2 2026 (Target), Q3 2026 (Validated)
- Leading Indicators: Processing time reduction (measured daily)
- Lagging Indicators: Headcount reduction, cost savings (measured quarterly)
Phase 5: Traceability Matrix
Complete Stakeholder → Driver → Goal → Outcome traceability:| Stakeholder | Driver | Goal | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| CFO | D-1: Reduce costs (FINANCIAL, HIGH) | G-1: Reduce processing time 7d → 2d | O-1: 30% efficiency increase, £2M savings |
| CTO | D-2: Modernize stack (STRATEGIC, HIGH) | G-2: 80% cloud workloads by 2026 | O-2: 50% faster time-to-market |
| Operations | D-3: Minimize downtime risk (RISK, CRITICAL) | G-3: Zero unplanned downtime | O-3: 99.95% uptime maintained |
Phase 6: Conflict Analysis
Identify Conflicts:- CFO wants speed (cost savings start sooner) vs Operations wants slow careful migration (minimize risk)
- CTO wants innovation (new technologies) vs Security wants proven solutions (reduce attack surface)
- Prioritize: Choose one stakeholder’s need over another based on power/importance
- Compromise: Find middle ground (e.g., phased approach - quick wins first, critical apps later)
- Phase: Satisfy both but at different times (MVP for speed, Phase 2 for quality)
- Innovate: Creative solution that satisfies both (e.g., automated testing for speed AND quality)
Phase 7: Engagement Plan
For each stakeholder:- Messaging: Address their specific drivers
- Communication Frequency: Weekly, monthly, quarterly
- Channels: Email updates, dashboard, town halls
- Change Impact: How this affects them (positive, neutral, negative)
- Resistance Risk: High, medium, low
- Role: Champion (advocate), Fence-sitter (neutral), Resister (blocker)
Phase 8: Governance (RACI Matrix)
| Decision | Responsible | Accountable | Consulted | Informed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology Selection | CTO | CEO | Security, Ops | All staff |
| Budget Approval | CFO | CEO | Finance team | Stakeholders |
| Go-Live Decision | Ops Manager | SRO | Testing, Security | End users |
UK Government Specific Context
For UK Government projects, the command identifies specific drivers:| Stakeholder | Typical Drivers |
|---|---|
| Minister | Deliver manifesto commitment, respond to parliamentary questions (POLITICAL) |
| Permanent Secretary | Ensure proper governance, avoid NAO criticism (RISK/ACCOUNTABILITY) |
| Service Delivery | Reduce call center volume, improve citizen experience (OPERATIONAL) |
| Digital/Technology | Modern architecture, attract digital talent (STRATEGIC) |
| Citizens | Fast accurate answers, accessible service (USER) |
| ICO | Data protection compliance, transparency (REGULATORY) |
| Treasury | Value for money, spending controls (FINANCIAL) |
- Ministerial dashboard metrics for parliamentary questions
- NAO audit readiness
- GDS service assessment pass rate
- Technology Code of Practice compliance
- User satisfaction on GOV.UK
Output File
Creates:projects/{project}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-STKE-v1.0.md
Contains:
- Executive Summary
- Power-Interest Grid (ASCII)
- Stakeholder Catalog (detailed profiles)
- Driver Analysis (by category)
- Driver → Goal Mapping
- Goal → Outcome Mapping
- Complete Traceability Matrix
- Conflict Analysis & Resolutions
- Engagement & Communication Plan
- RACI Matrix
- Risk Register (stakeholder-related risks)
Dependencies
Stakeholder analysis informs:| Downstream Artifact | How Stakeholders Are Used |
|---|---|
| RISK (Risk Register) | Every risk MUST have owner from RACI matrix |
| SOBC (Business Case) | Every benefit MUST trace to stakeholder goal |
| REQ (Requirements) | High-priority drivers get MUST requirements |
| DATA (Data Model) | Data owners assigned from RACI matrix |
| Engagement Plan | Communication tailored to drivers |
Quality Checks
A good stakeholder analysis:- ✅ Identifies all stakeholders with power or interest (don’t miss hidden influencers)
- ✅ Digs into underlying motivations (not surface-level wants)
- ✅ Shows clear Driver → Goal → Outcome traceability chains
- ✅ Quantifies everything possible (metrics, timelines, costs)
- ✅ Acknowledges conflicts honestly and proposes pragmatic resolutions
- ✅ Identifies synergies that create stakeholder alignment
- ✅ Provides actionable communication and engagement strategies
- ✅ Includes governance and decision rights
Next Steps
After stakeholder analysis:- Review with SRO to validate stakeholders and drivers
- Run
/arckit.riskto create risk register (uses RACI matrix for risk owners) - Run
/arckit.sobcto build business case (uses stakeholder goals as benefits) - Run
/arckit.requirementsto create requirements (aligned to high-priority drivers)
Related Commands
Risk Management
Create risk register with stakeholder risk owners
Business Case
Build SOBC from stakeholder goals
Requirements
Align requirements to stakeholder drivers
Example Outputs
M365 GCC-H Migration (v1)
M365 GCC-H Migration (v1)
NHS Appointment Booking (v7)
NHS Appointment Booking (v7)
Cabinet Office GenAI (v9)
Cabinet Office GenAI (v9)