Understanding Dilemmas
A dilemma in Dashboard Dilemas is a gamified learning experience where users navigate ethical scenarios by answering questions. Each dilemma can contain multiple questions organized by category, difficulty, and theme.Dilemmas are also called “Juegos” (games) in the platform interface. The terms are used interchangeably.
Dilemma Types
Dashboard Dilemas supports several game formats:Ángel o Demonio
Users make binary ethical choices, accumulating points for “angel” (ethical) or “demon” (unethical) decisions. Best for clear-cut ethical scenarios.
Pasapalabra
Inspired by the word game format, users answer quick-fire questions across different categories. Great for knowledge assessment.
Millonario
Quiz-show style with increasing difficulty and stakes. Users can use lifelines and must decide when to cash out. Ideal for high-stakes decision training.
Creating a New Dilemma
Initiate Dilemma Creation
Click the “Crear Dilema” button in the top-right corner.
This opens the WordPress custom post editor where dilemmas are managed.
Configure Basic Information
Fill in the essential details:Required Fields:
- Dilemma Name: Clear, descriptive title (e.g., “Dilemas Éticos en Recursos Humanos”)
- Type: Select the game format (Ángel o Demonio, Pasapalabra, or Millonario)
- Associated Client: Choose which client(s) can access this dilemma
- Description: Brief overview of the dilemma’s focus
- Instructions: User-facing guidance on how to play
- Estimated Duration: Help users plan their time (e.g., “15-20 minutes”)
Set Activation Details
Configure timing and availability:
- Activation Date: When the dilemma becomes available to users
- Expiration Date (optional): Deadline for completion
- Status: Set to “Publish” to make it active, “Draft” to keep it hidden
Adding Questions to a Dilemma
Filter by Your Dilemma
Use the filters to select:
- Client: The client associated with your dilemma
- Dilema: The specific dilemma you just created
Add a New Question
Click “Agregar Pregunta” and configure:
Question Content
- Question Text: The scenario or question users will see
- Be specific and realistic
- Include necessary context
- Keep it concise (2-3 sentences max)
Answer Options
Provide 3-4 possible responses:- Make them distinct and plausible
- Avoid obviously wrong “throwaway” options
- Ensure one answer is clearly most ethical/correct
- Report to HR immediately (CORRECT)
- Talk to the colleague privately and ask them to stop
- Ignore it—it’s not your business
- Offer to lend them money to help with their situation
Configure Question Metadata
Set additional parameters:
Category
Assign to a thematic category:- Ethics & Integrity
- Compliance & Legal
- Workplace Conduct
- Decision-Making
- Conflict Resolution
- Data Privacy
- Customer Relations
Difficulty Level
The system calculates difficulty based on user performance, but you can manually set:- Low (<0.40): Most users get it wrong—very challenging
- Medium (0.40-0.69): Moderate challenge
- High (≥0.70): Most users get it right—easier question
Difficulty is counter-intuitive: A “difficult” question has a LOW difficulty index because few people answer correctly.
Points Value
Assign point value based on:- Importance of the topic
- Difficulty of the question
- Strategic weight in overall assessment
Mark Critical Questions (Optional)
If a question addresses a high-risk topic (legal compliance, safety, harassment, etc.), mark it as Critical.Critical questions:
- Appear with a red indicator in analytics
- Are highlighted in risk reports
- Trigger alerts if failure rates are high
- Receive priority attention from admins
Question Writing Best Practices
Clarity and Specificity
Clarity and Specificity
Do:
- Provide sufficient context for users to make informed decisions
- Use realistic workplace scenarios
- Define roles clearly (“your manager,” “a client,” “HR”)
- Use vague or ambiguous language
- Assume specialized knowledge users may not have
- Create trick questions that test reading comprehension rather than ethics
Realistic Dilemmas
Realistic Dilemmas
The best questions present genuine ethical tensions where multiple values conflict:
- Loyalty vs. Honesty
- Short-term gain vs. Long-term trust
- Individual benefit vs. Team good
- Rule-following vs. Compassion
- Following company policy
- Meeting sales targets
- Maintaining customer relationships
- Ensuring product quality
Answer Option Design
Answer Option Design
Create 3-4 answer options with varying degrees of ethical soundness:
- Clearly Correct (Best ethical choice)
- Partially Correct (Acceptable but not ideal)
- Questionable (Problematic but not terrible)
- Clearly Wrong (Unethical or dangerous)
- Options that are all essentially the same
- Obviously ridiculous options no one would choose
- Options requiring information not provided in the question
- Only the “clearly correct” option should be marked as correct
- Consider partial credit for “partially correct” if your system supports it
Cultural Sensitivity
Cultural Sensitivity
Remember that ethics can be culturally influenced:
- Avoid scenarios that assume specific cultural norms
- Be cautious with religious or political topics
- Test questions with diverse groups before deploying
- Provide cultural context when necessary
Configuring Dilemma Difficulty
Balance your dilemma with a mix of question difficulties:Assess Question Distribution
After adding questions, review the difficulty spread:Ideal Distribution:
- 20-30% High difficulty (easy questions) - Build confidence
- 40-50% Medium difficulty - Core learning
- 20-30% Low difficulty (hard questions) - Challenge thinking
Monitor Performance
After users start completing the dilemma:
- Go to Preguntas and filter by your dilemma
- Sort by “Error Rate” (descending)
- Review questions with >40% error rate
- Determine if the question is:
- Too ambiguous (needs rewriting)
- Appropriately difficult (good challenge)
- Incorrectly marked (wrong answer flagged as correct)
Testing Your Dilemma
Complete the Dilemma
Play through the entire dilemma as a user would:
- Check for typos and clarity
- Verify questions appear in the correct order
- Ensure answer options display properly
- Test the scoring mechanism
- Confirm completion triggers correctly
- Review the final summary/results screen
Review Analytics
Log back into admin and verify:
- Session was recorded in Dashboard
- Answers are captured in Preguntas analytics
- Score calculated correctly
- User completion status updated
Managing Multiple Dilemmas
As your library grows, use these strategies:Organization
-
Naming Convention: Use clear, consistent names
- Good: “Ethics 101 - Introduction”, “Ethics 201 - Advanced Scenarios”
- Bad: “Dilemma 1”, “New Game”, “Test”
- Client Association: Clearly document which dilemmas are client-specific vs. reusable
- Version Control: When updating questions, consider creating a new version rather than modifying the original
Performance Comparison
Access Dilemma Comparison
In the Dilemas section, use checkboxes to select 2+ dilemmas you want to compare.
View Comparative Analytics
Click “Comparar” to see side-by-side metrics:
- Total sessions/users
- Average scores
- Completion rates
- Time to complete
- Question difficulty distribution
Advanced: Adaptive Dilemmas
While Dashboard Dilemas doesn’t have built-in branching logic, you can simulate it by:-
Sequential Dilemmas: Create follow-up dilemmas based on initial performance
- Users scoring <60% on “Ethics 101” get assigned “Ethics 101 - Remedial”
- Users scoring >80% get assigned “Ethics 201 - Advanced”
-
Targeted Question Banks: Create dilemmas focused on areas where users struggled
- If analytics show high error rates on “Data Privacy” questions, create a dedicated “Data Privacy Deep Dive” dilemma
-
Progressive Campaigns: Deploy dilemmas in phases
- Week 1: Awareness-building scenarios
- Week 2: Application and decision-making
- Week 3: Complex, multi-stakeholder dilemmas
Troubleshooting Common Issues
Users Complaining Questions Are Too Hard
Users Complaining Questions Are Too Hard
Diagnosis:
- Check average scores (if <50%, dilemma is too hard)
- Review error rates on individual questions
- Compare to benchmark dilemmas
- Add easier warm-up questions at the beginning
- Provide more context in question text
- Review answer options—are they too similar?
- Consider adding hints or clarifications
- Adjust scoring to be more forgiving
High Drop-Off Rate (Users Start But Don't Finish)
High Drop-Off Rate (Users Start But Don't Finish)
Diagnosis:
- Check average time to complete (if >30 min, too long)
- Identify where users are dropping off (which question)
- Reduce number of questions (aim for 10-15 max)
- Remove or simplify the question where drop-off occurs
- Break long dilemma into multiple shorter sessions
- Add progress indicators so users see end in sight
Low Engagement (Users Not Starting Dilemma)
Low Engagement (Users Not Starting Dilemma)
Diagnosis:
- Not a dilemma issue—likely communication/motivation problem
- Work with client to improve internal promotion
- Send reminder emails to non-starters
- Clarify benefits/incentives (certificates, recognition)
- Reduce perceived time commitment in communications
- Get leadership endorsement/participation
Next Steps
Manage Users
Learn how to track user progress through your dilemmas
Analyze Performance
Use analytics to evaluate dilemma effectiveness and user learning
Onboard Clients
Deploy your dilemmas to new client organizations
Admin Workflow
See how dilemma creation fits into overall platform management