Trigger Phrases
“data points”, “enrichment columns”, “column design”, “what to research”, “data point builder”, “build columns”, “segmentation columns”, “personalization columns”When to Use
- After
market-researchhas produced a hypothesis set - Before
list-enrichment- this skill designs the columns, that skill runs them - When the user says “what should we research about these companies?”
Two Modes
Mode 1: Segmentation
Goal: Design columns that score or confirm hypothesis fit per company. Input: Hypothesis set (frommarket-research or context file)
Process:
- Read the hypothesis set
- For each hypothesis, propose 1-2 columns that would confirm or deny fit
- Discuss with user - refine, add, remove
- Output final
column_configs
- Column: “Data Infrastructure Maturity” (select: [“No CRM”, “Basic CRM”, “Full stack”])
- Column: “Digital Footprint Score” (grade: 1-5)
Mode 2: Personalization
Goal: Design columns that capture company-specific hooks for email personalization. Input: Target list + what the user wants to personalize on Process:- Ask what hooks matter for this campaign (leadership quotes, recent launches, hiring signals, tech stack, etc.)
- Propose 2-4 columns with prompts
- Discuss with user - refine
- Output final
column_configs
- Column: “Recent Product Launch” (text: describe any product launched in last 6 months)
- Column: “Leadership Public Statement” (text: find a public quote from CEO/CTO about [topic])
Interactive Column Design
Refine together
Ask:
- “Any columns to add?”
- “Any to remove or merge?”
- “Should any prompts be more specific?”
Confirm column budget
Guidance:
- 3-5 columns is the sweet spot
- 6-7 is acceptable if each serves a clear purpose
- 8+ adds noise - push back and suggest merging
Column Config Format
Column Design Guidelines
Agent Type Selection
| Data point type | Agent type | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Factual data from the web (funding, launches, news) | research_pro | Needs web research |
| Classification from company profile | llm | Profile data is enough |
| Nuanced judgment (maturity, fit score) | research_reasoning | Needs chain-of-thought |
| People/org structure | linkedin | LinkedIn-specific |
Output Format Selection
| Data point type | Format | When |
|---|---|---|
| Free-form research | text | Open-ended questions |
| Score/rating | grade | 1-5 scale assessments |
| Category | select | Mutually exclusive buckets |
| Multiple tags | multiselect | Non-exclusive tags |
| Structured data | json | Multiple related fields |
| Yes/no with evidence | json | {"match": bool, "evidence": str} |
Prompt Writing Tips
- Always include
{input}for the company domain - Be specific about output format in the prompt itself
- Include fallback: “If not found, return N/A” or “If unclear, return ‘Unknown’”
- For
select/multiselect: list the labels in the prompt too - For hypothesis scoring: reference the specific hypothesis in the prompt
- Keep prompts under 200 words
Example Columns
Segmentation Column Example
Segmentation Column Example
Personalization Column Example
Personalization Column Example
Output Handoff
After column design is complete:- Present the final
column_configsJSON to the user - Tell the user: “These configs are ready for
list-enrichment. Run that skill with your table ID and these columns.” - If the user wants to run immediately, hand off to
list-enrichmentworkflow