Overview
Thearckit roadmap command creates a strategic architecture roadmap for multi-year initiatives. The roadmap shows the evolution from current state to future state across multiple themes, timelines, and governance cycles.
Command Syntax
Arguments
Project ID or initiative name, e.g.
001, cloud migration 3-year, digital transformation programmeWhat It Creates
Generates a comprehensive multi-year architecture roadmap:- File:
projects/{NNN}-{project-name}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-ROAD-v1.0.md - Document ID:
ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-ROAD-v1.0 - Content: Strategic roadmap with timeline, themes, capability evolution, investment, governance (typically 400-600 lines)
Prerequisites
RECOMMENDED: Also run
arckit stakeholders (for business drivers), arckit wardley (for technology evolution), arckit sobc (for investment figures), and arckit risk (for strategic risks).Interactive Configuration
The command prompts for two strategic choices:Question 1: Time Horizon
“What time horizon should the roadmap cover?”
- 3 years (Recommended)
- 2 years
- 5 years
Typical for technology transformation programmes — detailed enough to be actionable, long enough for strategic value
Question 2: Year Format
“Which year notation should the roadmap use?”
- UK Financial Year (Recommended)
- Calendar Year
FY 2025/26, FY 2026/27 — April to March, standard for UK Government and public sector
Roadmap Structure
1. Executive Summary
- Strategic Vision: What transformation is being enabled? (1-2 paragraphs)
- Investment Summary: Total investment, CAPEX/OPEX split, ROI, payback period
- Expected Outcomes: 3-5 measurable business outcomes
- Timeline at a Glance: Duration, major phases, key milestones, governance gates
2. Strategic Context
- Vision & Strategic Drivers: Link to stakeholder drivers, architecture principles alignment
- Current State Assessment: Technology landscape, capability maturity baseline, technical debt, risk exposure
- Future State Vision: Target architecture, capability maturity targets, technology evolution (reference Wardley Maps if available)
3. Roadmap Timeline
Visual Timeline: Mermaid Gantt chart showing 3-5 year timeline- Use financial year notation: FY 2024/25, FY 2025/26, etc. (if UK Government) OR calendar years
- Show 4 major phases: Foundation, Migration, Transformation, Optimization
- Include governance gates as milestones
4. Roadmap Themes & Initiatives
Create 3-5 strategic themes (e.g., Cloud Migration, Data Modernization, Security & Compliance, DevOps Transformation, Legacy Decommissioning) For each theme:- Strategic objective
- Timeline by financial year (what happens in FY 2024/25, FY 2025/26, etc.)
- Initiatives within each year
- Milestones and investment
- Success criteria
5. Capability Delivery Matrix
Show capability maturity progression over time using a table:| Capability Domain | Current | FY 24/25 | FY 25/26 | FY 26/27 | Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud Platform | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L4 |
| API Management | L1 | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 |
| Data Analytics | L2 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 |
| DevOps | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L4 |
| Security | L2 | L3 | L4 | L4 | L5 |
- L1: Initial: Ad-hoc, unpredictable, reactive
- L2: Repeatable: Basic discipline, some processes
- L3: Defined: Documented standards, proactive
- L4: Managed: Measured, controlled, predictable
- L5: Optimized: Continuous improvement, innovative
6. Dependencies & Sequencing
Create a Mermaid flowchart showing initiative dependencies:7. Investment & Resource Planning
- Investment Summary by Financial Year: Table showing CAPEX, OPEX, total by year
- Resource Requirements: FTE needed, key roles, recruitment timeline, training budget
- Investment by Theme: Budget allocation across themes
- Cost Savings & Benefits Realization: Operational savings, efficiency gains, revenue enablement
8. Risks, Assumptions & Constraints
- Key Risks: Strategic risks impacting roadmap (link to risk register if available)
- Critical Assumptions: Funding, skills, vendor support, executive sponsorship
- Constraints: Budget caps, regulatory requirements, timeline mandates
9. Governance & Decision Gates
- Governance Structure: ARB (monthly), Programme Board (monthly), Steering Committee (quarterly)
- Review Cycles: Weekly progress, monthly ARB, quarterly business review, annual strategic review
- Service Standard Assessment Gates (if UK Government): Alpha, Beta, Live assessments with dates
- Decision Gates: Go/No-Go gates at major phase transitions
10. Success Metrics & KPIs
Create tables showing progression over time:- Strategic KPIs: Cloud adoption %, technical debt reduction, security incidents, MTTR, deployment frequency
- Capability Maturity Metrics: Maturity levels by year
- Technical Metrics: API availability, page load time, IaC %, automated testing coverage
- Business Outcome Metrics: User satisfaction, cost reduction, revenue enablement, productivity gains
11. Traceability
Link roadmap back to source artifacts:- Stakeholder Drivers → Roadmap Themes
- Architecture Principles → Compliance Timeline
- Requirements → Capability Delivery
- Wardley Maps → Technology Evolution
- Risk Register → Mitigation Timeline
UK Government Specifics
For UK Government projects, roadmaps automatically include Service Standard Assessment Gates (Alpha, Beta, Live), Technology Code of Practice (TCoP) compliance, NCSC CAF security baseline progression, and Cross-Government Services (GOV.UK Pay, Notify, Design System) integration.
Included for UK Gov:
- Financial Year Notation: Use “FY 2024/25”, “FY 2025/26” format (not calendar years)
- Spending Review Alignment: Mention SR periods and budget cycles
- Service Standard Assessment Gates: Include Alpha, Beta, Live assessment milestones
- TCoP (Technology Code of Practice): Reference compliance with 13 points
- NCSC CAF: Include security baseline progression
- Cyber Essentials/ISO 27001: Security certification timeline
- Digital Marketplace: If procurement involved, reference G-Cloud/DOS
- Cross-Government Services: Reference GOV.UK Pay, Notify, Design System integration
MOD Specifics
For Ministry of Defence projects, roadmaps include JSP 440 (Defence project management), Security Clearances (BPSS, SC, DV), IAMM (Information Assurance Maturity Model), and JSP 936 (AI assurance if applicable).
Real-World Timeline Example
Typical multi-year transformation roadmap:- Foundation phase: 3-6 months (strategy, baseline, security framework)
- Migration phase: 6-18 months (legacy analysis, data migration, app modernization)
- Transformation phase: 12-24 months (cloud-native platform, API platform, DevOps maturity)
- Optimization phase: 6-12 months (performance, scale, continuous improvement)
- Total typical roadmap: 2-5 years
Command Handoffs
Create Detailed Project Plan for Phase 1
Generate Product Backlog
Roadmap vs Plan
Roadmap (arckit roadmap)
- Multi-year, multi-initiative
- Capability-focused
- Executive communication
- Strategic alignment
Plan (arckit plan)
- Single project
- Detailed tasks
- Delivery-focused
- Team execution
Important Notes
Key Concepts
- Strategic vs Tactical: Roadmap is multi-year strategic, Plan is single-project tactical
- Capability Maturity: Use 5-level model (L1: Initial → L5: Optimized)
- Governance: Roadmaps require heavier governance than project plans (ARB, Programme Board, Steering Committee, Quarterly reviews)
- Integration: Roadmap feeds into
arckit plan,arckit sobc,arckit backlog,arckit traceability - Realistic Timelines: Show investment increasing in middle years (migration/transformation), then decreasing in optimization phase
- Traceability: Link every roadmap theme back to stakeholder drivers and architecture principles