Overview
Thewardley command creates strategic Wardley Maps to visualize architecture decisions, build vs buy analysis, vendor evaluation, and technology evolution. Wardley Mapping is a situational awareness technique that maps components by value chain position and evolution stage to inform strategic decision-making.
Usage
What is Wardley Mapping?
Wardley Mapping is a strategic planning technique that maps:- Value Chain (Y-axis) - User needs → capabilities → components (top to bottom)
- Evolution (X-axis) - Genesis → Custom → Product → Commodity (left to right)
- Movement - How components evolve over time
- Dependencies - Component relationships
Evolution Stages
| Stage | Evolution | Characteristics | Strategic Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genesis | 0.00-0.25 | Novel, uncertain, rapidly changing | Build only if strategic differentiator, R&D focus |
| Custom | 0.25-0.50 | Bespoke, emerging practices, competitive advantage | Build vs Buy critical decision, invest in IP |
| Product | 0.50-0.75 | Products with feature differentiation, maturing market | Buy from vendors, compare features, standardize |
| Commodity | 0.75-1.00 | Utility, standardized, industrialized | Always use commodity/cloud, never build |
Mapping Modes
The command supports five mapping modes:Mode A: Current State Map
Purpose: Understand the current system landscape and dependencies When to Use:- Starting a new project
- Understanding existing system for modernization
- Identifying technical debt and inertia
- Baseline for future state mapping
Mode B: Future State Map
Purpose: Visualize the target architecture and evolution path When to Use:- Strategic planning and roadmap development
- Technology modernization initiatives
- Cloud migration planning
- Post-requirements, pre-design phase
Mode C: Gap Analysis Map
Purpose: Compare current state vs future state to identify actions When to Use:- After creating both current and future state maps
- Investment prioritization
- Risk assessment
- Change management planning
Mode D: Vendor Comparison Map
Purpose: Compare vendor proposals against strategic positioning When to Use:- During vendor procurement
- After receiving vendor proposals
- Evaluating build vs buy decisions
- Assessing vendor lock-in risks
Mode E: Procurement Strategy Map
Purpose: Guide UK Government Digital Marketplace procurement When to Use:- Before creating SOW/RFP
- Deciding procurement routes (G-Cloud, DOS)
- Build vs buy decisions at component level
- Identifying reuse opportunities
How It Works
-
Reads available documents:
- PRIN (Architecture Principles) - Strategic principles, technology standards
- REQ (Requirements) - Business and functional requirements
- STKE (Stakeholder Analysis) - Business drivers and priorities
- RSCH/AWRS/AZRS (Research) - Vendor landscape, TCO
- External Wardley maps and strategic documents
-
Identifies components from requirements and classifies by:
- Visibility (Y-axis 0.0-1.0): User needs (top) to infrastructure (bottom)
- Evolution (X-axis 0.0-1.0): Genesis to Commodity
-
Performs strategic analysis:
- Build vs buy decisions based on evolution stage
- Inertia factors (skills, process, vendor lock-in)
- Evolution velocity predictions
- Risk assessment
- Generates Wardley Map using OnlineWardleyMaps syntax
-
Writes document to
projects/{project}/wardley-maps/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-WARD-{NNN}-v1.0.md
Wardley Map Example
UK Government Benefits Chatbot
Strategic Analysis from Example
BUILD (Genesis/Custom):- Benefits Eligibility Guidance (0.25 - Genesis): Core user need
- Conversational Interface (0.38 - Custom): Competitive advantage
- Human Review Queue (0.45 - Custom): HIGH-RISK AI compliance
- Benefits Rules Engine (0.42 - Custom): Domain-specific IP
- Bias Testing Framework (0.35 - Custom): AI safety requirement
- GPT-4 LLM Service (0.72 - Product): Commercial LLM via Azure/AWS
- Authentication (0.68 - Product): Auth0 or GOV.UK Verify
- Cloud Hosting AWS (0.95 - Commodity): G-Cloud AWS
- PostgreSQL RDS (0.92 - Commodity): AWS managed database
- GOV.UK Notify (0.92): Email/SMS notifications
- GOV.UK Design System (0.75): Frontend, accessibility
Component Positioning Guide
Visibility (Y-axis: 0.0-1.0)
- 0.90-1.0: Direct user needs (what users see/interact with)
- 0.60-0.89: Enabling capabilities (user-facing features)
- 0.30-0.59: Supporting components (business logic, services)
- 0.00-0.29: Infrastructure (databases, cloud, networks)
Evolution (X-axis: 0.0-1.0)
- 0.00-0.25 (Genesis): Novel, unproven (custom AI model, new algorithm)
- 0.25-0.50 (Custom): Bespoke, emerging (custom integration, specialized service)
- 0.50-0.75 (Product): Commercial products (Salesforce, Oracle, SAP)
- 0.75-1.00 (Commodity): Utility/cloud (AWS S3, Azure SQL, Auth0)
Build vs Buy Strategy
Build When:
- Evolution < 0.50 (Genesis/Custom)
- Strategic differentiator or competitive advantage
- No suitable market solutions exist
- Domain-specific IP worth developing
- Compliance requires bespoke solution
Buy When:
- Evolution > 0.50 (Product/Commodity)
- Mature market with multiple vendors
- Standard business capability
- Faster time to market needed
- Lower total cost of ownership
Never Build:
- Evolution > 0.75 (Commodity)
- Cloud services (compute, storage, databases)
- Authentication and authorization
- Email/SMS delivery
- Standard infrastructure components
UK Government Specific Analysis
GOV.UK Services Mapping
For UK Government projects, always map reusable GOV.UK services:Digital Marketplace Procurement Strategy
| Component | Evolution | Procurement Route | Framework |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genesis (< 0.25) | Build in-house OR DOS Outcomes (discovery + build) | DOS Outcomes | |
| Custom (0.25-0.50) | DOS Outcomes (if strategic) OR G-Cloud (if product exists) | DOS Outcomes / G-Cloud | |
| Product (0.50-0.75) | G-Cloud (commercial products) | G-Cloud | |
| Commodity (> 0.75) | G-Cloud (cloud services: AWS, Azure, GCP) | G-Cloud |
Technology Code of Practice Mapping
- Point 3 (Open Source): Annotate components that should use open source
- Point 5 (Cloud First): Highlight commodity cloud services
- Point 8 (Share/Reuse): Identify GOV.UK services and cross-government reuse
- Point 11 (Purchasing): Link to Digital Marketplace procurement strategy
AI Playbook Compliance
For AI systems, the map must include:- AI components annotated with risk level (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
- HIGH-RISK requirements:
- Human-in-the-loop (Custom component, ~0.45 evolution)
- Bias testing (Custom capability)
- ATRS publication requirement (annotation)
- DPIA/EqIA mandatory (annotation)
Enhanced Strategic Analysis
Wardley maps include:Doctrine Assessment
Scores organizational maturity across:- Communication (common language, transparency)
- Development (think small, user focus)
- Operation (metrics, continuous improvement)
- Learning (bias towards action, challenge assumptions)
- Leading (strategy, vision)
Gameplay Patterns
Identifies applicable strategic plays:- Offensive: Tower & moat, ecosystem, open source play
- Defensive: Second mover, exploiting inertia
- Anti-patterns: Legacy trap, premature innovation
Climatic Pattern Analysis
External forces affecting components:- Everything evolves (commoditization pressure)
- Co-evolution (components evolve together)
- Inertia (resistance to change)
- Technology waves (cyclical innovation)
Output
The command generates:Wardley Map Document
projects/{project}/wardley-maps/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-WARD-{NNN}-v1.0.md containing:
- Map Visualization Code - OnlineWardleyMaps syntax
- Component Inventory - All components with evolution stages
- Evolution Analysis - Components by stage with recommendations
- Build vs Buy Analysis - Strategic decisions for each component
- Inertia and Barriers - Resistance to change, mitigation strategies
- Movement and Predictions - 12-month and 24-month evolution forecasts
- UK Government Context (if applicable) - GOV.UK services, procurement, TCoP
- Dependencies and Value Chain - Component dependency tree
- Risk Analysis - High-risk areas and opportunities
- Recommendations - Immediate, short-term, long-term actions
- Traceability - Links to requirements, principles, assessments
Integration with Other Commands
Input from:principles- Architecture principles and strategic directionrequirements- Business and functional requirementsstakeholders- Business drivers and prioritiesresearch- Vendor landscape and TCO data
roadmap- Strategic roadmap from evolution analysisstrategy- Architecture strategy synthesissow- RFP for vendor procurementsobc- Economic case with strategic justificationhld-review- Validates design against strategic positioning
Examples
Example 1: Current State Map
- Existing components and their evolution stages
- Technical debt and inertia points
- Dependencies and critical paths
- Baseline for modernization planning
Example 2: Future State Cloud Migration
- Desired future components
- Cloud service selection (AWS vs Azure vs GCP)
- Evolution targets and migration paths
- Build vs buy decisions
Example 3: Vendor Procurement Strategy
- Components color-coded by procurement route
- G-Cloud vs DOS recommendations
- Build vs buy analysis
- Vendor lock-in risk assessment
Map Quality Standards
Good Wardley Maps:
- All components have clear visibility and evolution positions
- Dependencies flow top-to-bottom (user needs → infrastructure)
- Evolution stages match reality (not arbitrary)
- Strategic decisions align with evolution stage
- Inertia factors explicitly identified
- Movement/evolution predictions included
- Traceability to requirements and principles
Common Mistakes to Avoid:
- Misclassifying cloud services as “Custom” (they’re Commodity 0.90+)
- Positioning novel AI as “Product” (should be Genesis if truly novel)
- Building commodity components (waste of investment)
- Buying for Genesis needs (no market solutions exist)
- Not using GOV.UK services when available (UK Government projects)
- Missing human-in-the-loop for HIGH-RISK AI
Visualization
View maps by pasting the Wardley code into: https://create.wardleymaps.ai Visualization helps:- Spot strategic patterns
- Identify clustering (areas of focus)
- See evolution trajectories
- Communicate strategy to stakeholders
Next Steps
After creating a Wardley Map:- Create Roadmap -
arckit roadmapfrom evolution analysis - Develop Strategy -
arckit strategysynthesizing insights - Research Vendors -
arckit researchfor Custom-Built components needing market research - Generate RFP -
arckit sowfor procurement - Validate Design -
arckit hld-reviewagainst strategic positioning
Related Commands
- research - Technology research feeding into maps
- aws-research - AWS service positioning
- azure-research - Azure service positioning
- roadmap - Strategic roadmap from evolution
- strategy - Architecture strategy synthesis
- sow - RFP generation for procurement